"What do Barack Obama and Osama bin Laden have in common? They both have friends who bombed the Pentagon!" R. Limbaugh
Most Americans are panicked about the economy (congratulations Democrats, since the passage of the bailout bill the Dow has plunged 1,000 points; since the Democrat takeover of Congress the Dow has declined from approximately 12,400), disenchanted by the prosecution of the war, and dyspeptic concerning alternative sources of energy. For many, the foregoing concerns define the political debate; people are missing the forest for all the trees. We are witnessing seismic changes in the basic ideas that define America. Ideas embodied both in the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution. Capitalism is being cast aside for socialism, Marxism is being repackaged and touted as a banal alternative to democracy. These are the fundamental issues at stake. The controversy surrounding Obama and Ayers brings into focus the real questions that lurk beneath all the glib, rehearsed talking points.
The uniformed continue to question the veracity of Obama's connection to the terrorist William Ayers. Therefore, I will make reference to the Chicago Annenberg Challenge or CAC. This organization was conceptualized by Ayers as an organ for the transmission of finances to community organization groups and radical education activists. Barack Hussein Obama served on the board of the CAC until 2001. Ayers channeled more than 100 million dollars into the CAC where Obama served. Ayers did not entrust 100 million dollars to Obama based on a casual and tenuous relationship. You'd have to be a dullard to think otherwise.
Indeed, Ayers committed his acts of insurrection, sedition, and terrorism when Obama was only a child. But, Ayers has never repented of his crimes; to the contrary, he still spews the same Marxist dogma and militant philosophies. Ayers' radicalism now festers primarily in his educational philosophy. Any conscientious American would turn their back in disgust from the vile William Ayers. However, Obama not only associated with Ayers but engaged in a long and amicable working relationship with the inveterate subversive. The issue here is Obama's commiseration with radical, militant personalities and his complete lack of judgement regarding his association and tacit approval of William Ayers' radical political and educational philosophies. A man's friends reveal the nature of his character. Obama has a long and clear history of radicalism. The accumulated weight of Obama's nefarious associations establish him as radical in the extreme. We are poised, as a nation, to place a radical socialist in the White House.
"What you love and what you hate reveal what you are." Dr. B. Jones, Sr.